As John C. Hull wrote, "the purpose of a hedge is to reduce risk. A hedge tends to make unfavorable outcomes less unfavorable but also to make favorable outcomes less favorable." In his very well regarded Options, Futures, and Other Derivatives (7th edition), he provides an excellent example of how a hedge can work against you:
- President: This is terrible. We've lost $10 million in the futures market in the space of three months. How could it happen? I want a full explanation.
- Treasurer: The purpose of the futures contracts was to hedge our exposure to the price of oil, not to make a profit...
- President: What's that got to do with it? ...
- Treasurer: If the price of oil had gone down...
- President: I don't care what would have happened if the price of oil had gone down. The fact is that it went up...
Hedging limits risk but it also limits profit.
When it comes to the impact of hedging, it's important that your performance attribution system be conscious of its contribution. I've already cited Karnosky & Singer, but would recommend Carl Bacon's book as an excellent source to fully comprehend this model. Carl presents it relative to the Brinson-Fachler model, while Karnosky & Singer use Brinson, Hood, Beebower. Both should be in your library. And, if derivatives are something you're involved with, then Hull's book belongs there, too!
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.