tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2568941354104807757.post1580498629465539861..comments2023-10-05T09:07:24.225-04:00Comments on Investment Performance Guy: GIPS standards changes via the HandbookDave Spauldinghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01777929408680234896noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2568941354104807757.post-6724963829124241832013-07-08T08:06:30.433-04:002013-07-08T08:06:30.433-04:00Carl, we agree on much more than just this. If a c...Carl, we agree on much more than just this. If a change to the rules or new rules are introduced through Q&As, then (a) they should be identified in a manner that everyone is made aware and (b) introduced with effective dates. To introduce totally new rules should, in my view, be done with public comment. Glad we agree :-)Dave Spauldinghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01777929408680234896noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2568941354104807757.post-61439568813646443752013-07-08T07:43:21.297-04:002013-07-08T07:43:21.297-04:00Dave,
For once I agree with you. There is no need...Dave,<br /><br />For once I agree with you. There is no need to make this change - its a useful disclosure -one that I think can be removed after 10 years - but one year is too short for any relevance and of course it opens up a discussion that managers can choose whether a disclosure is meaningful or not - which I'm quite sure is not intended. <br /><br />These issues have been discussed many times - changes should be restricted to new problems only.<br /><br />I know its tempting to correct "old errors" when the opportunity arises - but it should be avoided - the more likely impact is a new problem<br /><br />Regards<br /><br />CarlAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com